Which circumstance for deadly force is authorized by a lawful order from superior authority?

The authorization of deadly force under a lawful order from superior authority indicates a scenario where military personnel are given direct instructions that justify such use of force in specific circumstances. This is grounded in military law and the rules of engagement that dictate the boundaries of acceptable force in various operations.

When an individual receives a lawful order, it carries the weight of authority and is expected to be executed, provided it meets legal standards. Such orders might pertain to specific operational situations where the use of deadly force is necessary, and this necessity is clearly articulated within the command structure.

In contrast, emergency response typically involves situations where quick action is necessary, but it does not inherently mean that deadly force is authorized merely because the situation is urgent. Self-defense is a principle that can justify the use of force if there's a threat to one's immediate safety but does not stem from an order. An imminent threat implies that there is a danger present that requires action, which might not always align with following orders. Thus, the acknowledgment of a lawful order as a valid circumstance for the use of deadly force underscores the importance of command hierarchy and judiciousness in military operations.